A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2017, the Defendant died of a person at the front of the “C main point” located in Jin-si B, Jin-si around 02:00.

I will find out how you can find out.

“The 112 Report is 112. On the same day, the report was sent to the site on personal information, details of the report, etc. from the slope E belonging to the D District District in the Chungcheongnam-gu Police Station D District on the same day, and the police officer was asked about the personal information, details of the report, etc., and the report was sent to the site, and the police officer was sent to the site on the A.I., “I., I., at the latest, I.B., I will return to the breast and die.”

E. Ne. Hashee is a police officer;

This humping theory, i.e., “this hume”, and the slope E, which has prevented this, humped “Num chum chum fumb.”, hume E, with the left face of slope E one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers related to 112 reports, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the above E, such as damage to sins which require approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of statutes to the victim police officers of violence photographs, work logs, records of handling reports, and records of diagnosis of injuries;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act, the Defendant asserts that he was in a state of mental or physical weakness or mental loss by drinking alcohol at the time of the instant crime. Thus, according to the records, the Defendant is deemed to have drinking alcohol at the time of the instant crime, but considering the circumstances such as the background and result of the instant case, the Defendant’s behavior before and after the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant did not have or lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions, and thus, the above assertion cannot be accepted.