logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.10.30 2015고합99
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 5 years and fines of 100,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 3 years and 70,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A is the head of T City Corporation or the head of the development1 team, Defendant C is the head of T City Corporation, and T City Corporation is established pursuant to Article 49 of the Local Public Enterprises Act. The executives and employees under his jurisdiction are deemed public officials in the application of bribery under the Criminal Act. The Defendants are deemed public officials in the application of bribery under Article 83 of the same Act.

1. On April 5, 2012, Defendant A and Defendant B conspired to receive the payment for the construction order from the company by taking advantage of the fact that Defendant A, as the chief of the Turban Construction Headquarters, may exercise influence over the construction work and allow the construction company to enter into a contract for the construction of a model house with a specific company. Defendant B agreed to receive the payment for the construction order from the company. Defendant B had the construction company enter into a contract for the model house construction with the company that Defendant B arranged by exercising influence as the chief of the headquarters, and Defendant B had the construction company enter into a contract for the model house construction with the company that was arranged by the corporation. Defendant B agreed to participate in a contract for the construction of a model house with the company that was arranged by the corporation.

Accordingly, Defendant B, around May 2012, introduced D and D, which introduced D and D, which introduced D and D, Inc., Ltd., to “T City Construction Headquarters A may be selected as a Y Model E&C construction.” Defendant A and D, etc., and Defendant A explained D’s work plan around that time, while Defendant A explained D’s work plan, and Defendant B issued KRW 100 million from X to Defendant B and Defendant A, if the advance payment was made.”

Afterward, Defendant B received KRW 50 million in cash from D in the office of the president in the office located in the office of the said officetel on June 2012, 2012. On the same day, Defendant B received KRW 50 million from D in the office of the head of the office located in the said officetel.

arrow