1. The Defendant calculated the Plaintiff’s KRW 101,449,146 with 15% per annum from December 4, 2015 to the date of full payment.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by taking account of the whole purport of the pleadings in each description of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 2-1 to 6, evidence No. 8-1, 2, A14, evidence Nos. 1 and 3.

The Defendant prepared an implementation plan and announced it on April 20, 2009 by the Daegu Metropolitan City notification No. 2009-75 of the Daegu Metropolitan City on April 2009.

B. 1) Meanwhile, the Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Electric Power Corporation”) is abbreviationd.

(2) On November 209, the Defendant planned the extension of the transmission line underground (TF) construction (TF) but requested the Defendant to perform concurrent construction in order to prevent any budget waste caused by the double excavation of roads and to minimize the inconvenience of vehicle traffic. (2) On August 201, 2010, the Defendant entered into an agreement on concurrent construction with the extension of the instant transmission line construction and the distribution line construction between Korea and Korea. (3) On August 201, 201, both Korea and the Defendant entered into an agreement on concurrent construction of the transmission line construction with Korea.

According to the above Convention, the road expansion construction is implemented by the defendant, and the underground transmission and distribution line construction is implemented, and the underground transmission and distribution line construction is implemented by the communications business operator, and the costs required for the expansion of this case are borne by the defendant and the costs required for the underground transmission and distribution line construction are borne by the Han River.

In addition, Han Power agreed that the removal of the existing utility model after prior consultation with the mobile carrier should not be hindered in the promotion of the construction work.

Pursuant to the above Convention, the Defendant and the Han River concurrently performed the extended construction of the instant case and the underground power distribution line undergroundization construction.

C. The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Han-dong and the Jeonju, and the Plaintiff’s super-high speed information and communications network.