logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.07.02 2014고단114
특수절도등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On May 13, 2013, the Daejeon District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and two years of suspension of execution on December 27 of the same year, which became final and conclusive on December 27 of the same year.

1. Defendants who attempted special larceny and H (hereinafter “Defendants, etc.”) came to know of society, and were in close friendly with each other, and they came to know of financial difficulties due to Internet gambling, etc., and they came to know of gold banks together. On November 28, 2013, the new wall Defendant C, sirened in the name of Defendant C, who was used by Defendant A, was able to search for the object of committing a crime, and discovered a mutually precious metal point of “L” operated by the victim K in the Jung-gu Daejeon District Court of Daejeon, Daejeon, and set it as the object of the crime.

Defendant, etc.: (a) purchased at the store of the name “N” located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon; (b) on November 29, 2013, at around 02:00 the next day, she moved the above K5 vehicle operated by H to the Han field Library located in the Daejeon-gu Culture Complex; (c) on the one hand, the Defendants moved approximately 800 meters away from K5 vehicles to the above “L”; and (d) while the Defendants waiting for a vehicle in the vicinity of the “L” while they have stolen precious metals from “L,” they waited for a vehicle from the Defendants to the contact with the Defendants; and (e) they waited at the same place in the old-gu electricized zone.

At around 02:30 on the same day, the Defendants reported the network, and Defendant C attempted to cut the locks attached to the hacker installed at the entrance of “L” with a hacker brought by Defendant B, but failed, and Defendant B and Defendant C continued to see the network. Defendant B and Defendant C opened the board installed on the outside wall of “L” store, and opened the board board with a hacker prepared prior to their intrusion.

arrow