Defendant

A Imprisonment with labor of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment with labor of one year, and Defendant C's fine of ten million won.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] Defendant A was a de facto operator of the C Co., Ltd., and was awarded a contract for the construction of gas stations from around November 25, 2012, and Defendant B was a de facto operator of the C Co., Ltd., and was awarded an order for construction of agricultural products from the Taean-gun D Co., Ltd., from around 2012 to the actual operator of the C Co., Ltd., and Defendant B was a person who was awarded a contract for construction of agricultural products, etc. from around May 7, 2009 to March 20, 2015; and F is an executive of the G Co., Ltd, exercising the final right to vote in the selection of the construction company and the payment of the construction price for the construction works ordered by the D Co., Ltd.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A

A. On June 13, 2013, the Defendant entered into a negotiated contract with regard to H gas station enlargement works ordered by the D Association, and received KRW 179,482,193 from June 25, 2013 to August 13, 2013. Around June 25, 2013, the Defendant was scheduled to place an order for construction works with respect to gas stations at D Association around A and around A and around 2013.

On September 30, 2013, the Defendant demanded from F, the president of the D Association, the president of the D Association, to pay KRW 10 million in return for receiving orders from the D Association. On the same day, the Defendant transferred KRW 10 million to the account in the name of J of D Association staff designated by F.

Accordingly, the defendant provided a bribe to F who is deemed a public official in relation to his duties.

B. On November 201, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that the indictment for employees of K Co., Ltd. (former “K”) L Co., Ltd. (former “L Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “L”) was an employee in charge of contract management; (b) however, in full view of the evidence in the judgment, M is recognized as a person working as a director in charge of contract management at the time when L Co., Ltd., the director in charge of contract, subcontract, construction site supervision, etc.; and (c) U was an employee in charge of contract management; (d) however, U was an employee in charge of contract management.