The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment without prison labor and two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant violated a traffic accident in violation of the signal and inflicted an injury upon the victim requiring medical treatment for six months, and its nature is not less than that of the crime. Moreover, even if the defendant had already been punished several times for the same crime, the defendant committed the crime in this case again despite the fact that the vehicle operated by the defendant had already been involved in the same crime, the vehicle operated by the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the victim had already been considered in the court below. The fact that the victim did not want the punishment for the defendant was already considered at the court below. There are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be considered in sentencing newly after the decision of the court below, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, home environment, the circumstances and result of the crime, etc., are considered to be unfair even

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.