A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of a sentence shall be deferred for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In this case.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a man-made company called “H” located in G in the prime city of nuclear power.

On August 6, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant entered into a tegrative construction contract for the victim K’s residence in the said tegrative tegrative tegrative tegrative tegrative tegrative tegrative tegrative tegrative tegrative egrative egrative egrative egrative egrative egrative egrative egrative egr

However, the Defendant, due to the shortage of funds at the time, appropriated the construction cost or office operating fund for another construction site. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to complete the construction work within the time limit as agreed by the victim due to the shortage of funds, such as receiving loans from the third financial sphere, due to the lack of funds.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, was issued KRW 2,95,00,000 from September 22, 2015 to the victim, including the fact that he/she received KRW 3 million from the victim as the down payment on the same day and received KRW 3 million from the victim as the down payment on the same day, and was issued KRW 2,95,00 from September 22, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of K Witness;

1. A standard contract for interior works ( August 9, 2015), a detailed statement of deposit transactions (Evidence No. 23), a field photograph (Evidence No. 24), a written estimate (Evidence No. 143), and a statement of deposit details;

1. Application of statutes on financial transaction details;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a comprehensive selection of imprisonment, with labor);

1. The Defendant is a person who operates the test company called “H” in G in the State of original state, with respect to the charge of not guilty of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution.

1. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant against the victim D entered into a collective agreement with the victim D to seek consideration from the “M” located in L on April 14:00, and the victim’s “a remote area, lighting fixtures, and front door.”