1. The Defendants: (a) each of the KRW 1,309,258, within the scope of the property inherited from the networkR to the Plaintiff; and (b) 583.

On June 15, 200, the Plaintiff issued a credit guarantee certificate of 16,20,00 won to a quid pro quo agricultural cooperative on June 15, 2001, and on June 25, 2006, pursuant to a credit guarantee agreement with the deceased R 100 (hereinafter “the deceased”), and upon the performance of the guaranteed obligation under the above credit guarantee agreement, the Deceased agreed to pay the Plaintiff damages in accordance with the rate of subrogation and damages determined by the Plaintiff from the date of full payment to the date of full payment. The credit guarantee accident occurred after the Deceased borrowed the above credit guarantee certificate as collateral to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s credit guarantee claim was 10,36,898 won to the Agricultural Cooperative on October 11, 207, the heir’s 19,36,898 won on behalf of the deceased on June 27, 2007, and the heir’s 201, the heir’s maximum indemnity rate of KRW 16,196,2846,265,265 won per annum

According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants, as the inheritor of the deceased’s property, are obligated to pay each principal and delay damages indicated in the order corresponding to their respective shares in inheritance among the indemnity obligations owed by the deceased against the plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited by the deceased. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants of this case is with merit.