1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “each real estate of this case”) with a tradition of not less than 30 years, and when referring to an individual real estate, referring to the real estate of this case according to the sequences in the separate sheet. On April 15, 2013, the Plaintiff was a member of the G Labor Association affiliated with the A General Assembly (FIE). After the G Labor Association was separated from the HNono Association and the INonononoo Association, it was changed to the Inonoo Association on August 30, 2014.

On the other hand, the Association shall:

9. 12. The J sent the Plaintiff church to the temporary president of the Plaintiff church, and the Plaintiff church

9. In 28. Joint Council, J was appointed as a plaintiff church member.

B. On March 16, 2008, Defendant C was dismissed from office after suspending the duties of Defendant C on October 21, 2008, on the condition that “the appointment of a delegated pastor through a three-year new vote is made.” On August 30, 201, the GEU dispatched K pastor to the temporary president of the Plaintiff church on the ground of the expiration of the term of Defendant C, and on August 30, 201, the Plaintiff church sent it to the temporary president of the Plaintiff church. On February 2, 101, the Plaintiff church passed a non-Confidence resolution with respect to Defendant C at the joint council attended by 127 persons who are the three-year regular teachers, and thereafter, the GEU suspended the duties of Defendant C and dismissed from office in accordance with the disciplinary judgment on October 21, 2008. Accordingly, Defendant C lost not only the status as the temporary pastor of the Plaintiff church, but also the qualification as the representative of the Plaintiff church.

C. Nevertheless, on May 28, 2013 without a resolution of the joint council of the Plaintiff church, Defendant C completed the registration of change of the name of each representative on October 31, 201, changing the name of each representative on the remaining real estate in the name of the above Defendant from K and L, while the registration of change of the name of each registered titleholder changed in the name of the above Defendant on October 14, 2014 as to the instant 1, 2 real estate on January 6, 2015, and the registration of change of the name of each owner on the instant 4, 5 real estate from the Plaintiff to the Defendant church.

The term "registration for change of the indication of each registered titleholder of this case" shall be referred to as "registration for change of each registered titleholder of this case".

D. As such, Defendant C is the Plaintiff.