1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants ordering payment in excess of the following amounts shall be revoked:

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts of recognition are as follows: (a) except that the defendant B, “Defendant B,” as “Defendant B,” in Chapter 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts, the Defendants are recognized to have acquired money by deceiving the Plaintiff as above. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are jointly liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the tort.

B. 1) In the above recognition of the amount equivalent to the amount of the liability for damages, 30,148 e.g., the sum obtained by the Plaintiff through deception of the Defendants (=7,800 x 10,348 x 12,000 x 12,000 x) constitutes direct property damage caused by the Defendants’ tort, the Defendants shall jointly compensate the Plaintiff for the above 30,148 e.g., the Plaintiff. However, if the obligee claims foreign currency claims designated in foreign currency conversion into Korean currency by exercising his/her right to substitute benefit, the court orders the obligor to perform the said claims shall consider as the standard for converting the foreign exchange price near Korean currency at the time of the closing of argument at the fact-finding court (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 90Da2147, Mar. 12, 1991; 2000 x 12,000 m.).