1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. On May 5, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that, while the insured vehicle A, who is the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff, was driving on the road near the Maddong, the insured vehicle B, who is the preceding vehicle, set up an influorous object away on the road. As a result, the above objects were shocked into the front glass and dust portion of the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 100,000 insurance money, the Defendant, who is the insurer of the vehicle causing the above accident, is liable to pay the Plaintiff the above KRW 10,000 and the delay damages therefrom.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 and 5, the Plaintiff entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with C with respect to A, and around May 5, 2013, the Plaintiff’s claim for the Plaintiff is without merit, since it was insufficient to recognize the existence of prior vehicles at the time of the accident and the circumstances leading up to the Plaintiff’s assertion, as there was no other evidence to acknowledge it.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.