1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on January 5, 2015 on the case No. 2014 Won1074 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

A. Name of the invention 1) invention of this case: The term “pixel” means a minimum unit showing image of an organic light display device. In the invention of this case, the term “pixel” means a unit containing a red, green, or blue, and this constitutes “sulphe” in the comparable Invention 3 (Invention 521). In the comparable invention 3 (Invention 521), the term “traffic” is used for the term “traffic” as a unit of visual image composed of several graphics. For convenience, the term is indicated as “sule” or “sule” and the unit composed of multiple graphics (e.g., e., graphics) and the number of pictures composed of two graphics is indicated as the unit of graphics, and the structure is indicated as the unit of graphics under the arrangement of multiple 1)/36/100 of the size of the device in accordance with the arrangement of the claim number 20-136/201, respectively.

(i) There is a mutual conflict between the 1 chemicals set forth above, and the 2 chemicals in which each central point is located at the first fap point of the 1st type above, in each of the above 1 chemicals (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 2”);

(i) and each of the above 1 chemical units is different from each other, and the multiple 3 chemical units (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 3”) in which each center is located at the second ap point adjoining to the above 1 apex referred to in the Category A above (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 3”);

(1) include any of the above-mentioned (hereinafter referred to as the "Composition 4") and any of the above-mentioned Sub-paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 3, in a different form (hereinafter referred to as the "Organization 4").

Nos. 2 and 3 above, respectively, are larger than the 1 chemicals set forth above.