The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (6 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime and reflects the wrongness, and that he/she should support the child.

However, the crime of this case is a major crime that promotes speculation and disturbs the people's sound sense of work. In light of the size of the gambling site of this case and the earnings, etc., the defendant is not less and less likely to commit the crime of this case. The defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had been sentenced to imprisonment for 6 months in relation to the crime that operated the Internet gambling site at Suwon District Court in 2012 and a punishment for 2 years in suspended execution, and the defendant committed the crime of this case again. In full view of all the factors of sentencing as indicated in the records and the theory of changes, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.