1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 2014, the Plaintiff reported that “A candidate, etc. participating in D elections conducted at the Changwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office (Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office) was in violation of the Public Official Election Act by making contributions, such as providing or promising to provide property benefits to women’s organizations for the purpose of using them for election campaign” in relation to D elections among C simultaneous local elections conducted at the Changwon District Public Prosecutor’

B. On December 4, 2014, a public prosecutor who belongs to the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the public prosecutor’s office was prosecuted on the basis of the Plaintiff’s report, and was prosecuted by four relevant persons including D elected persons under suspicion of violating the

C. On February 3, 2016, the Plaintiff received the notification of the final disposition from the branch office of the original district public prosecutor’s office, and on February 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for payment of reward money under Article 6 of the Rules on the Payment of Monetary Rewards for Election Crimes (amended by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice No. 603, Nov. 28, 2006; hereinafter “instant Rules”).

On May 27, 2016, the Defendant decided to pay the Plaintiff a monetary reward of KRW 5 million in accordance with the guidelines for the payment of monetary rewards for election crimes (hereinafter “instant guidelines”) pursuant to Articles 16 and 15 of the instant Rules, subject to deliberation by the relevant committee, following the deliberation of the committee pursuant to the “Guidelines for the Payment of Monetary Rewards for Election Crimes” (hereinafter “instant guidelines”), and deposited the said KRW 5 million in the bank account under the Plaintiff’s name on June 16, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion is accompanied by the National Election Commission and the National Election Commission led the promotion of the report reporting system and the public relations for the establishment of a clean and fair election culture. In particular, the plaintiff investigate and investigate the violators of the Public Official Election Act.