The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (along-term imprisonment, additional collection of KRW 764,00) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant, who judged the grounds for appeal, made a confession of all the crimes of this case, and repented in depth the mistake.

The defendant is in a position to support her children alone, is economically and economically insufficient, and is not improved in health condition.

However, each of the crimes of this case is calculated as the sentencing guidelines for the crimes of this case [the scope of final sentence due to multiple crimes [the scope of punishment shall be 1 to 3 years] as they fall under the aggravated area of crimes of this case [the scope of punishment] 2 types (mariju, Do administration item (b) and (c), etc.), 1 to 6 years (one year and 6 months) (one year and 6 years), 2, and 3 of the same criminal records (the suspension of execution within 3 years), 3 types (the scope of recommendation), 1 to 3 of the aggravated areas (one year and 3 years), and 1 to 3 years of the same criminal records (the suspension of execution within 3 years of less than 1 to 6 years). Meanwhile, even though the defendant had been punished several times for the same crime, the defendant committed the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, and the defendant's selection of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime]. Thus, the court below's decision is without merit.