Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an employee who was in charge of real estate consulting and trading in C Co., Ltd. and the victim D is a representative director of the above company.

The defendant around December 5, 2012, around December 6, 2012, around December 7, 2012, around 40 employees of the Guro-gu Seoul E-building, and around December 7, 201, and 40 employees of the company commuting to and from work at the place where many and unspecified customers are rare.

C Company D Representatives are accused of criminal charge.

A criminal charge is filed against a representative who takes a large amount of increase in KRW 21 million that has been sold in bulk 9.9 million.

Wurged representatives who are not in monthly salary and who are not in monthly salary.

The number of purchase shall be 30%-20%-10%, and the number shall be changed unfairly.

Along with the fact that a complaint was filed, the person who was responsible for the filing of the complaint shall be bound by all the employees.

The team dissolution business loss is responsible.

J. 1 1,000 won

땅. 두 마리 토끼 수익이 용돈되는 투자 거짓 번번히 말바꾸는 대표. 증거가 예라고 있는데. 전무 F와 짜고 악의적으로 팀 해체를 한 대표 진실을 밝힙시다"라는 내용이 기재된 피켓을 들고 1인 시위를 하여 공연히 사실을 적시하여 고소인의 명예를 각 훼손하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of one pocket ticket or demonstration;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (to select an honorary point of damage and a fine);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the illegality should be avoided since the criminal facts stated in the judgment are true and true, and the defendant's public interest is limited to the defendant's assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Where an act impairs another person's honor, it shall be the public.