logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.13 2017고단310
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C5 tons of cargo vehicles.

On September 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 09:17, and driven the road near the cargo terminal site intersection, which is located in 1202, Donsan-si, 1202, along the two-lanes, from the surface of the private road of the 2nd Corporation to the side of the 2nd Corporation, at a speed of about 50km in speed, depending on the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the 3rd road.

At all times, since the signal, etc. is a private-distance intersection in operation, the driver has a duty of care to live well with the electric-way signal and drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was found to have been driving in the front direction while driving in the front direction with a stop signal, and was found to have been delayed, from the opposite direction, the Defendant violated the signal to avoid any collision with the vehicle moving on the right line in accordance with the subparagraph of the right line, and due to the negligence of the Defendant’s cargo loaded on the cargo of the Defendant at the right line with the cargo vehicle, lost the weight-centered center, went beyond the right line with the cargo vehicle, and went back to the right line with the 2nd Corporation private-distance surface of the victim D (62 aged)’s E-5 business taxi driving in the front line with the victim’s 1st line, who was directly in accordance with the Defendant’s credit, from the 2nd Corporation private-distance surface with the 2nd Corporation private-distance surface, and continued to go beyond the upper part of the 5th passenger taxi driving in the front of the 27th passenger car stopping in the front of the 27th passenger vehicle in the front direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury of the victim D, such as 12 weeks of plehion, 3 times, 12 pressure sod, etc., and the injury of the victim F, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Data to cut a black stuffe image;

1. Application of Chapter Two Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow