1. The Defendant’s KRW 147,675,322 and KRW 123,082,460 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 123,082,460 from January 22, 2015 to February 16, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 29, 2010, our bank granted a loan of KRW 130,000,000 to the Defendant at a rate of 17% per annum and on April 27, 2012, the expiration date of the extension period.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant claim”). B.

On August 30, 2012, our bank transferred the instant claim to a limited-liability company specializing in the 17th asset-backed securitization in Korea. On February 27, 2014, 2014, our limited-liability company specializing in the 17th asset-backed securitization in Korea, which was notified the Defendant of the transfer of the claim at the time of the transfer of each of the above claims.

C. The principal and interest of the instant claim amounting to KRW 123,082,460 as of January 21, 2015, plus KRW 147,675,32 as of January 21, 2015.

【Reason for Recognition】 Each entry of the evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 3 (including each number number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the principal of and interest on the loan of KRW 147,675,322 and the principal of KRW 123,082,460, which is the day following the date on which the above principal and interest on the loan is calculated, to February 16, 2015, the service date of the original copy of the payment order in this case, the rate of 17% per annum from January 22, 2015 to February 16, 2015, and the delay damages calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the loan contract between the plaintiff and the Korean bank on April 29, 2010 is null and void as a false conspiracy, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the above assertion. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.