The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On May 8, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime on May 8, 2014, at the Co., Ltd. D’s office in the Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., Ltd., the two-way film of Ansan-si, Ansan-si on May 8, 2014, requires installation, repair, etc. of facilities, machinery, etc. to establish a factory.

The net profit of at least 100 million won may be generated in a month as a contract for the construction of a pair of houses and apartment construction is concluded, and a plan is planned to receive a quantity equivalent to at least 2 billion won in a month in the on-the-counter side of the

The borrowed money will be registered as a shareholder on the face of the week by borrowing the money, and the borrowed money will be repaid until August 29, 2014 by receiving additional investments or generating profits.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant had no particular property, and had to be equipped with factory facilities with the money borrowed from the victim or another person, so it was difficult to generate profits through factory operation, and there was only a plan to attract additional investment, but did not have been in the situation of attracting investment commitments, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim.

On May 29, 2014, the Defendant received 67 million won from the damaged party to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of E Co., Ltd. on May 29, 2014, and 150 million won on June 3, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On June 9, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime on June 9, 2014, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) on June 1, 2014, issued securities of KRW 110,000,000 as money for mechanical rent to the victim D in order to lease machinery from the Boan Company. The Defendant paid KRW 77,000,000,000,000 to the victim after the transfer of the money shortage.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property and should be equipped with factory facilities with money borrowed from the victim or another person, thereby making profits through factory operation.