logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.07 2014가합31559
토지인도등
Text

1. Defendant B:

(a) remove each facility listed in the separate sheet No. 1;

B. The part corresponding to the above paragraph (a).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person with the purpose of jointly running a business related to the concentrated industry, etc., and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 21, 2014, respectively, on the voluntary auction procedure (the Jeju District Court E; hereinafter referred to as “voluntary auction”) concerning real estate (the combination of each of the instant land and each of its ground buildings; hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land and each of the instant buildings”), such as Seopo-si, Seopo-si, and its ground buildings (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”).

B. At the time when the Plaintiff received the decision of permission for sale in the voluntary auction of this case, each of the lands of this case had facilities (attached Form 1 list) and trees, landscaping stone (attached Form 2 list; hereinafter “instant trees, etc.”) not included in the above objects of sale, and the above facilities, etc. exist on each of the lands of this case as they are, after the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of each of the lands of this case, until the date of closing argument.

C. The location of each of the above facilities, trees, etc. is as shown in the attached Tables 4, 5, and 1 through 5, and the monthly rent for the part where each of the above facilities, trees, etc. of the pertinent land is located shall be as listed in the attached Tables 4 and 5.

Before the commencement of the voluntary auction of this case, each of the instant lands, buildings, other facilities, trees, etc. were owned by the network A. However, the deceased decided to transfer the instant trees, etc. to accord and satisfaction of KRW 500 million among the Defendant C’s debt amounting to KRW 1.25 million, and entered into an agreement on the transfer of ownership, such as the statement in the evidence No. 7, with Defendant C on November 30, 2010.

E. Meanwhile, the deceased on September 29, 2014, and the deceased on September 29, 2014, among those children, Defendant B became the sole inheritor upon Non-Party F’s report of renunciation of inheritance on December 12, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 7, 9, 10 (including each number), Eul evidence 3-1, Gap evidence 8, 11, and 12 (including each number);

arrow