logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.01.16 2019나51954
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The grounds for the cited judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance except for a change as described in paragraph (2). Thus, it shall be quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The modified part;

A. On May 21, 2017, the part of the first instance court’s decision that changed the facts of recognition was “(2) No. 7 of the first instance court’s decision,” and subsequently, the part “as to May 21, 2017, sent the Plaintiff with H message, stating “the sample photograph to be loaded in the message,” and adding “the description of “the sample photograph to be loaded.”

From June 29, 2017 to July 6, 2017, the first instance court’s second sentence “from June 29, 2017,” “A quarantine was conducted at a quarantine station belonging to the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of the Philippines,” and entered the port of Busan on June 29, 2017. On July 5, 2017, the Plaintiff sent H message stating that “The Defendant entered the port of Busan on 29 days, but it is necessary to verify the quality of the PPP due to the excessive time from the start to the arrival.” On July 5, 2017, the Defendant issued the PPP 20 to the Busan Regional Food and Drug Administration (hereinafter “Food and Drug Administration”) with the same seal, and notified the PPP 6th PP of the foregoing import declaration to the same effect as the PPP 20.7 on July 7, 2017.

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written from Part 1 to Part 5 by "each entry and video of No. 1 through 9, No. 8 and No. 10 (including paper numbers)".

B. The judgment of the court of first instance on the “judgment on the Defendant’s assertion” is amended.

arrow