logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.18 2015누815
전공상불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following two and three cases. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

this subsection shall be filled by the following:

B. On June 4, 2010, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she was wounded on the grounds that he/she had rendered an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that he/she did not have any causal relationship with the performance of official duties, and filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State again on March 9, 201, with the Defendant on the ground that he/she did not have any causal relationship with the performance of official duties.

[신청 이유] 원고는 2006. 12. 말 분소대 전술훈련 야간교육 시 산에서 내려오다 미끄러져 뒤로 넘어지면서 둔상부를 돌부리 같은 데 찧으며 머리까지 땅에 부딪힌 후 요통이 발생하였다.

After April 2007, the horses are moved to an attack area at night between the joint and several tactical training.

Now, while getting off from mountain, the pains have become more severe as a result of the flaging of stone, etc., and on December 2007, 2007, at the time of education and training prior to the AOP input, the flag was lowered from mountain, and the flag was more severe, and the flag was received inverte 5-1, 2008.

In addition, on March 2008, when the night patrol was conducted on June 2009, in order to seriously see the right edge while moving stairs at night, it was done on June 2009.

3. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be 9 to 10,000,000,000.

4. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed. The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow