logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.06.14 2013고합301
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(관세)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months, and a fine of 450,616,258 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The name, standard, quantity, price, etc. of goods from any foreign country shall be reported to the head of any customhouse thereon.

Nevertheless, at around 05:15 on May 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) divided the amount of KRW 696,752,000 (won 450,616,258) into two of the Sea Seas; and (b) tried to import them into the Republic of Korea without filing a report thereon with the customs collector; and (c) tried to import them into the Republic of Korea without filing a report thereon to the customs collector’s personal effects.

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to import a multimond equivalent to a total of 696,752,00 won in the market value without filing a report thereon with the customs collector.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An accusation or a Korean Customs Declaration;

1. An appraisal report and an appraisal report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 6 (7) and (2) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 271 (2), Article 269 (2) 1, and Article 241 (1) of the Customs Act (a fine equivalent to twice the cost of goods imported pursuant to Article 6 (6) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes shall be imposed concurrently);

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53, 55(1)3 and 6 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (2,000,000 won per day);

1. The crime of this case committed on the grounds of sentencing under the main sentence of Article 282(2) of the Confiscation Customs Act is found to have been discovered that the defendant attempted to import the Montreal in a total of 6.9 million won in the market price. Such crime is likely to disrupt customs administration, thereby undermining the sound development of the national economy, and the market price of Damond, which the defendant intended to import smuggling, is considerably higher than 1,00,000, by classifying Damond by size, and put it into the tape and into the red sea.

arrow