A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as causing similar rape to Defendant C, which was located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court No. 418, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court No. 418, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul.

Defendant 1’s defense counsel of the instant case: (a) the Defendant made such a statement to the witness that “I would have to have fluent fly fluent fly fluent fly,” while making the victim’s sexual organ as soon as possible; (b)

I cannot answer the question "..."

If it was, it was known that the Nos. was written in any sing.

There is no fact at all.

Before the response of the counsel, the counsel "at the time when they had been or had been waited," any sound, such as the victim's sound "at the time of being waited," "at the time of being waited," "at the time of being wait," "by the Do," " by the Do," and " by the Do," etc., is fit.

“At all, there is no question, and if you were to talk about this question, I do not have any absolute fluenc that we would talk about this question.

“The answer was made.”

However, at the time, the Defendant had been able to talk about the victim’s sexual organ as above in the process of making C enter the victim with strong pressure, and the Defendant had been able to talk about the victim’s sexual organ as above, and he had been able to talk about the victim’s sexual organ in the main water with the meaning that the victim is different from his intention.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Public trial records (two times) in the Central Court 2015 Gohap 360;

1. Each recording note with respect to D, E, Defendant, and C;

1. Each judgment (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015 Gohap 360, Seoul High Court Decision 2015No 1988, Supreme Court Decision 2015Do19653)

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. Application of statutes governing field photographs.