1. The Defendant’s KRW 35,870,746 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from October 1, 2017 to February 12, 2018, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 10, 2017, the Happiness City Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Happiness City Construction”) concluded a contract with the Defendant for construction of a new factory on the land of 2,400 square meters of land for public housing as of September 30, 2017 with regard to construction of a factory on the land of 2,400 square meters of land for public housing, and concluded the contract on September 30, 2017, and thereafter completed the construction of the said new factory (hereinafter “instant construction”).

B. On June 8, 2017, in the Daejeon District Court Decision 2017Dadan20479, the Plaintiff was sentenced to the Plaintiff to pay to the Plaintiff 30,340,000 won per annum from February 12, 2016 to March 21, 2017, and the amount calculated by the rate of 5% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, and 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment. The said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

On July 26, 2017, the Plaintiff received a seizure and collection order as to the instant construction cost claim against the Defendant for the construction project of happy City with the amount claimed as the Daegu District Court 2017TTTTTTT105343, totaling KRW 33,574,358, including the principal and interest based on the above judgment, etc., and the said seizure and collection order was served to the Defendant around that time.

C. Meanwhile, on August 10, 2017, in the Daejeon District Court Decision 2017Kao-3027, the Plaintiff received a decision that “the amount of the litigation cost that the construction of happy City is to be repaid to the Plaintiff with respect to the case of the construction cost for the construction work, 2,270,58” on August 10, 2017, which became final and conclusive around that time.

On September 4, 2017, the Plaintiff received a seizure and collection order as to the instant construction cost claim against the Defendant of the construction project, which was rendered by the Daegu District Court 2017TTTTTTT106506, totaling the costs of lawsuit, etc. based on the above decision, and issued a seizure and collection order as to the instant construction cost claim against the Defendant of the construction project, and the said seizure and collection order was served to the Defendant around that time.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number if there is a tentative number), Eul.