logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.09 2019누49221
허가사항변경처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the court of first instance are re-examineed along with the plaintiff's assertion

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court regarding this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 6th 13th 6th 13th 6th 6th 13th 6th 13th 1st 2th 2th 6th 2th 3th 2th 2th 3th 2th 3th 2th 2th 3th 2th 3th 2th 3th 3th 2th 2th 201, “the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that “the Plaintiff performs the function of treating symptoms containing chlorates,” other than “the solution for infections, etc., among the instant medicines,” that “the 1st 2th 2th 1th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 2nd 200.

arrow