Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA car.

On March 14, 2017, the Defendant continued the front road E at the time of 08:10 on the direction of Seosan Apartment apartment, from the direction of Seosan Police Station.

A driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering system, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, not to drive the motor vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others, depending on the road traffic situation and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and to properly report the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went through as it was, and the Defendant was able to receive the victim F (47 years old) who is going on the lane in the direction of marina course as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim’s death on the 18th day of the same month at the Soyang University Hospital located in Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon to the death of the victim due to her occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not seem to be against the consequence of the crime, such as the death of the victim due to the instant accident, the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant, the primary crime is the victim, the victim’s bereaved family members and the bereaved family members have agreed smoothly, the vehicle is covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and the Defendant is at least at a disadvantage of status as a waterway once if the Defendant is subject to a suspended sentence or heavier punishment due to the instant crime, and it appears to be somewhat harsh to the Defendant and his/her family members.