Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:10 on June 20, 2013, the Defendant, at the house of the victim D (n, 75 years of age) located in Bocheon-si, determined that the victim was able to report the opening to the opening of the Defendant, and that the Defendant’s opening did not easily drink the Defendant’s feed, thereby making it difficult for the Defendant to do so. While the Defendant and the Defendant were in dispute with the victim, the Defendant knished both descendants of the victim with balkbbbbb, thereby making the victim’s knish, and carried out both parts of the bal part, which requires two weeks of treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Investigation report;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Emergency medical services log;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Although the summary of the argument is true that the defendant knife the victim's knife in order to prevent the victim's self-injury, it is irrelevant to the victim's knife two knife injury and the defendant.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court. ① At the time of the police investigation, the Defendant first stated that “the victim did not mention the fact of self-injury of the victim at the time of the police investigation,” but only stated that “the victim abused the Defendant’s arms by scambling the Defendant and scambling the Defendant, thereby preventing the Defendant from doing so.” The Defendant asked the police to the effect that “ how the police could have been sent back on the first way on the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of