logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.09.07 2015구단1834
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 29, 2012, while working at the construction site of a lower part of a lower part of a construction company, the Plaintiff suffered injury from the Defendant’s medical care, resulting in the sprinking sponsed to the spons beam beamline (hereinafter “instant accident”), i.e., e., e., sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed spons,

B. On September 2, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the “satisfafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafa (hereinafter “instant injury”) occurred” in the course of treating the existing injury

C. On September 30, 2015, according to relevant statutes and medical opinions, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant the Plaintiff an application for the above additional injury and disease approval on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant accident and the instant injury and disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was based on the instant accident, and even if there was no direct causal relationship between the instant accident and the instant injury, it is evident that the instant injury and the instant injury and the injury and disease were significantly contributed to the instant injury and disease in the process of treating the existing approved injury and disease.

Therefore, since the injury of this case was caused by occupational accident, the defendant's disposition of this case on different premise is unlawful.

B. A worker who is receiving medical care due to an occupational accident is required to receive medical care because of additional discovery of an injury or a disease that has already occurred due to the occupational accident, or where medical care is necessary due to a new disease caused by an injury or a disease that has already occurred due to the occupational accident.

arrow