logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2017.01.18 2016가합134
건축주명의변경
Text

1. The Defendants will implement the procedure to change the name of the owner of the project in the name of the owner of the mountain, mountain, and mountain.

Reasons

1. The Defendants, on October 11, 2013, entered the Defendants as the owner of the building in the building E (hereinafter “instant building”) located in the mountain area, the mountain area, Si, Si, Gun-si (hereinafter “the instant building”) and reported the Defendants to the competent authority and started the extension work.

On October 31, 2014, the voluntary auction procedure for the instant building (F of this Court) was carried out, and the extension section was included in the instant building, and sold to G on January 7, 2016, along with the instant building.

G sold all real estate sold to the Plaintiff on January 7, 2016.

Until now, the extended portion has not been entered in the building ledger and the registration of preservation of ownership has not been completed.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. If a building is being constructed after obtaining permission from an administrative agency or filing a report with an administrative agency, the transferee of the building under construction needs to change the name of the building owner in order to continue the construction project in progress, and after completion inspection, it is necessary to register the building management ledger as the owner and change the name of the building owner in order to apply for registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the transferee. To this end, the transferee shall submit a report on change of the building owner pursuant to the construction related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as Article 11(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Building Act, along with a written consent to change of the name of the building owner before the change of the building owner. Therefore, if the transferor

(See Supreme Court Decisions 88Meu6754 delivered on May 9, 1989, and Supreme Court Decision 2006Da28454 delivered on March 12, 2009

According to the above facts, the plaintiff who has taken over the building of this case needs to prepare a building register for the extended part and change the name of the owner in order to preserve ownership, and is the owner of the extended part.

arrow