1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders revocation below, shall be revoked.

Defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (b) the 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., whether the instant oil transport business was illegal or not; and (c) the Plaintiff and the Defendant changed the part concerning the allegation added or emphasized again by this court, as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of “3 additional parts” as stated below; (c) the part concerning the instant oil return and the suspension of the payment of oil subsidies is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, i.e., the 20th judgment of the court of first instance, i., whether the instant oil transport business was legitimate after the transfer of the truck transport business (i) the status of the transferor entitled to engage in the truck transport business, and thus, the transferor becomes unable to engage in the truck transport business as much than the number of transferred parts.