1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The gist of the plaintiff's assertion is C's punishment, and the defendant was in a de facto marital relationship with C.

At the time of de facto marital relationship, the Defendant and C purchased an automobile listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant automobile”) and registered it in the name of the Defendant, and sold the instant automobile to the Plaintiff on May 7, 2015.

Therefore, the Plaintiff seeks implementation of the procedure for the registration of change of the name of the instant automobile against the Defendant.

2. In full view of each of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, it is recognized that the automobile of this case was already scrapped and revoked on February 18, 2020, and the plaintiff cannot seek against the defendant for the implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration for the automobile of this case.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.