The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is an employee of E Co., Ltd., whose representative is the Defendant, and the Defendant’s death penalty is F, the director of the same company, who is the operator of G Co., Ltd., and G, the principal office of G, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, who was operating from December 201, closed its business, and the said place was used as a three-factory of E Co., Ltd. from May 2012.

On July 16, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking the payment of KRW 29,251,110 of retirement allowances against E Co., Ltd. at the third factory of the above E Co., Ltd. around 15:36, and I filed a lawsuit against G Co., Ltd. for the payment of KRW 29,251,110 of retirement allowances, and the Changwon District Court 2012, which was sentenced on June 26, 2013, based on the judgment of 7496, intended to seize the iron plates and work units owned by G in its jurisdiction by the execution officerJ of the Changwon District Court on the basis of the judgment of 5:36, 2013.

The phrase "does not enforce seizure in a way that makes it unclear the ownership relationship of the movable property," thereby hindering the seizure of movable property, which is a legitimate official execution of enforcement officers, by deceptive means.

2. Determination

A. At the time of Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant is a director of “B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”)” (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”), and there is no movable owned by G in this context.

there is no statement to the enforcement officer, and there is a statement to that effect that the statement has been made.

Even if there is no evidence to acknowledge that there is a steel plate and work cost owned by G in the three factories at the time.

B. Review (1) According to each legal statement made by the complainant I, his agent K, the J of Execution Officer, the office clerk L, and the protocol of impossibility of executing seizure of corporeal movables, it is recognized that the defendant introduced himself as a director at the time and made the statement to the effect that he did not have any corporeal movable owned by G.

(2) However, in this Court.