beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor, two months of imprisonment, and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 7, 2016.
1. On May 18, 2015, the Defendant met the victim E in front of D located in C at the time of S. M. S. A on May 18, 2015 and changed the mobile phone opening in the name of a widther to raise the insurance performance. The Defendant did not need to pay the fee for the termination immediately after counting the performance.
In doing so, a false statement was made that “No problem will be raised by opening a new mobile phone.”
However, the Defendant: (a) opened a mobile phone in the name of the victim from the beginning; (b) was thought to use the mobile phone for the purpose of either disposing of it or settling small amount after receiving it from the victim; and (c) did not think that he would pay the terminal price and the user fee; and (d) at the time, the victim, even if he opened the mobile phone and used it for the purpose of disposing of the mobile phone or settling small amount after deceiving other persons than the victim in the same manner, did not intend to reinstate it later.
Nevertheless, on May 18, 2015, the Defendant received 64G (K) one unit of Soviet 64G (K) from the injured party in the name of the injured party in the G located near Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu in the name of the injured party and obtained property benefits equivalent to the same amount because the Defendant received 64G (M) one unit of f4G (K) from the J located near the above G in the same day in the same manner on the same day. On the following day, the Defendant received 64G (M) one unit of f4G (M) in the same way in the above G-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and received 64G (M) one unit of the cell phone in the name of the injured party, such as receiving 3 unit of the cell phone total of the mobile phone in the name of the injured party, and did not pay 2,460,000 won in total and the user fee claimed for the above mobile phone.
2. The Defendant on May 18, 2015