logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.06.13 2018고정75
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the business owner who operates D in Daegu Seo-gu and engages in retail business of medical devices, health functional foods, etc., and the defendant A is the employee of the above D.

No one shall indicate or advertise that the name, manufacturing method, quality or nutrition labelling of foods, etc., genetically modified foods, etc., or food traceability labeling or advertising with the efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or that such foods, etc. are likely to mislead or confuse as medicine or health functional foods.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to make an exaggerated advertisement that the “E”, which is a salt, has efficacy for the prevention and treatment of diseases.

Accordingly, around October 17, 2017, the Defendants publicized and advertised “E” to customers in the above D, and Defendant B expressed the following contents: “I wish to see that I can see that I can see that I can see that I can see that I can see this salt and that I can see it in a large number of times. I can see that I can see that I can see that I can see it with a high flick, so I can see it with a high flick, so I can see it with a high flick, we can see that I can see that I can see it with a high flick, we can see it with a high flick or high flick, and that I can see it with a high flick or high flick, so I can see that I can see it with a high flick or high flick, so I can see that I can see it with a high flurine content.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to prevent and treat diseases.

arrow