1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) around October 2009, the Plaintiff left the Defendant’s counter-explos as to the need for appraisal by requesting the Defendant, who operates a store for secondhand goods in front of the Seoul Gangnam-gu C department stores, to sell a single set of Damond 1, and then left the Defendant’s counter-explos. The Defendant did not have any contact thereafter.

② After that, the Defendant was detained upon the Plaintiff’s criminal complaint, and the Defendant promised to return the above surrender upon agreement.

However, the defendant has not been contacted since then.

Therefore, the defendant has the duty to deliver the above half to the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to acknowledge the above assertion by the plaintiff.

In addition, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.