A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) the defendant;

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are victims C (ma, South, 68 years old) and victims D (ma, 60 years old).

1. Special intimidation;

A. On June 2017, the Defendant committed a crime in the middle of 2017, at the house of the victim C in the Namnam-gun of the Republic of Korea on June 2017, 2017, the Defendant: (a) lent the bonds of high rate of money on the security of his/her own in Gangwon-do; (b) but was unable to repay money by raising all the money; (c) the kitchen knick (19cm in length, 31cm in total) and the household (23cm in length) which are dangerous things in the kitchen at the place of the kitchen; and (d) took the part of the part of the victim C and the victim D, putting the part of the victim C and the victim D, “17 million won in money.”

last one is the last one.

However, it should not be solved again.

The death is expected to be made out.

"............." the victims threatened, as they were.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

B. On September 2, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as before and after September 2, 2017, on the same day as before and on September 2, 2017, for the same reasons as before and on the same day as in the preceding paragraph, uses the transition (13 cm in length, 23 cm in total) that is a dangerous object in the kitchen located in the kitchen at the same place (25 cm in length) as his/her hand, in which he/she sets up the parts of the victim C and the victim D, and then sets up KRW 25 million until the new wall.

We will die at all times.

The homicide case between parents' self-influence on the world does not go against.

The Republic of Korea goes to the Southern Sea-Eup, and the Republic of Korea has provided money to the new wall.

"............." the victims threatened, as they were.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C or D;

1. A report on internal investigation (in the place of occurrence of the incident);

1. A motive for the occurrence of special intimidation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 1 through 3 of the seized evidence;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) (special intimidation) of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for committing a crime;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.