1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 291,381,941 and KRW 158,266,183 among them. From October 16, 1992 to February 1993.

1. Claim against Defendant A

A. According to the overall purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 4 as to the cause of the claim and the entire purport of the arguments, each of the facts listed in the annexed sheet Nos. 1, 2, and 3 can be acknowledged. Thus, the defendant A, as the principal obligor of the indemnity debt, is liable to pay the plaintiff the money and the damages for delay as stated in

B. As to the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant Company A alleged to the effect that it should be exempted since it was declared bankrupt, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, and thus, the Defendant Company A was not present at the date of pleading, but failed to submit documentary evidence. However, according to reference materials attached after the reply, it is not the above Defendant’s representative director C, who is an individual representative director of the above Defendant, nor the Defendant.

The defendant's assertion itself is without merit.

2. Claim against the defendant B

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Applicable legal provisions: Judgment of deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);