logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.01.20 2014고정781
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 3, 2014, at around 23:10, the Defendant: (a) stolen one instant World Cup from the Dorogate of the Dorogate of the C building in light of the following circumstances; (b) took advantage of the victim’s Dorogate and Dorogate in light of its mutual view; and (c) assaulted the victim’s Dorogate with two hand, sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere, knife sphere sphere sphere sphere, and sphere sphere sphere

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F, and part of witness G, legal statement;

1. Partial statements of each police interrogation protocol against the accused (number 3,5 No. 3,5);

1. E’s statement among the interrogation protocol of the police officer as to E and the second interrogation protocol of the police officer as to the accused (number 5);

1. Among the F’s statement statement and the police’s statement about G, part of the statement [the defendant and his defense counsel did not assault the victim as described in the facts charged] is asserted that there was no assault as described in the facts charged, but the victim’s statement about the circumstance of assault committed by the defendant as described in the facts charged is specific and consistent; ② witness F made the statement that “the victim and the defendant were satisfing one another, and the victim satisfing one another, and the defendant satisfing one with the satfing one, and the victim satisfing one with the satfing one.” The statement is specific and consistent; F and G’s statement about F’s witness’s witness are consistent with those of F; ③ the defendant was found to have been satfing the victim’s buck in the police station; ③ the defendant’s buckbuck part of the victim’s satfing part was bucked and died.” It is sufficiently consistent with the facts charged in this case’s statement and part of the facts charged.

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow