A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Measures after Accidents) by the Defendant are a person engaged in driving Category C rocketing motor vehicles.

On April 10, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:35, while driving it, 168, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, had been driving at the 15th of the Gero village at the 15th of the Gerogic village from the river basin to the mountain basin

At the time, there was a night and non-working, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to see the front door to the person engaged in driving service and accurately operate the operation and steering gear and to safely drive it.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was found to have been the first left part of the EM5 vehicle driven by the victim D(48 tax) waiting to turn to the left at a one-lane due to the negligence of driving the vehicle.

Defendant 1 suffered from the victim’s base base for approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, Defendant 1 did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle so that the damaged vehicle can be damaged by the repair cost of KRW 3,788,277 and escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the damaged person.

2. On October 21, 2018, the Defendant continued to engage in a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving), and the Defendant continued to drive the shooting distance of the mountain mountain park in the high-wing, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, in the ancient cities around October 21:40. In such a case, the person engaged in driving service had a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle safely by accurately operating the brakes and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive under the influence of alcohol in a state in which he is unable to drive normally, sees the rear of the victim F(46) driver’s G rocketing car in the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and the said rocketing car in the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, H in the front direction of the signal (as seen, she).