logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.12.30 2014고단818
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a leisure car in C.

On July 21, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on July 21, 2014, and continued the front road of the E- pharmacy D at the time of macroscoping with the front side of the road at the right distance.

At the same time, there were parked vehicles on the right side of the road, and there were signal-based vehicles on the front side, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle with a safety distance that can be avoided when the vehicle stops.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led to the left-hand side of the passenger vehicle owned by F, which was parked in on-road parking lot by negligence, to the front-hand part of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle, and the rear part of the victim H(31 years of age) who continued to cross the front-hand part of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle, which was driven by the victim H(31 years of age) who continued to cross the front-hand part of the passenger vehicle by the victim J (25 years of age) who continued to cross the front-hand part of the passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim H, such as salt satisf and a part of the surrounding land in need of treatment for about four weeks, and suffered injury to the victimJ, such as satisf and tensions which require treatment for about three weeks. At the same time, the Defendant immediately stopped the victim H’s satisf, and escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim, etc., even though the victim’s satisfe was damaged with property worth KRW 5,595,000 for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to J and H;

1. The actual condition survey report;

arrow