The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, in collusion with a person who was unaware of his name, did not forge the name and signature of the insured column of each insurance subscription of this case by entering the name and signature of B in the insured column of each insurance subscription of this case, and accordingly, did not intend to obtain insurance money by using the above insurance subscription form.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged (i) The Defendant was the former wife B, who was diagnosed as kidne cell cancer around November 2009, and was diagnosed as the insured on February 2, 2010, and conspired with B to use the insurance subscription form by forging B’s signature by forging it with the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the way of forging B while the name in the name in the name in the name in the way of forging B’s signature.

㈎ 사문서 위조의 점 피고인은 성명 불상자와 함께, 2014. 12. 26. 14:00경 서울 중구 C에 있는 피고인의 집에서, D 주식회사의 보험상품인 E에 가입하면서, 피고인은 D 주식회사의 보험모집인인 F에게 성명 불상자를 B이라고 소개하는 한편, 볼펜으로 보험청약서의 각 계약자란에 ‘A’, 그 옆 서명란에 ‘A’이라고 적고, 성명 불상자는 B의 행세를 하며 보험청약서의 계약전 알릴의무 피보험자란과 계약의 체결이행 등을 위한 개인(신용)정보 처리 동의서 피보험자란 및 상품의 소개 등을 위한 개인(신용)정보 처리 동의서 피보험자란에 각 ‘B’이라고 기재한 다음, 그 옆 서명란에 ‘B’이라고 적고 동그라미를 쳐 B의 서명을 하였다.

The Defendant continued to subscribe to G, which is an insurance product of D Co., Ltd., and entered “A” and “A” in each contractor’s column in the subscription form for insurance with the insurance package, and the name infinite is the insured’s column, the insured’s duty to notify the contract, the execution of the contract, etc.