1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 302,131,450 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from September 30, 2016 to July 11, 2018.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a party’s position 1) The Plaintiff is a 374.03 square meters per floor among E buildings in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, C, and D (hereinafter “instant 1 real estate”).

(2) Of the F building of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, KRW 101 30.4 m2 and KRW 514.22 m2 m2 m2,000,000,000 for the aggregate of KRW 101 m2,00,000 for underground floors

(2) The Defendant is the first real estate and the second lessee of the instant real estate.

B. On July 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the instant livestock products transaction (hereinafter “instant livestock products transaction agreement”) with the effect that, if the Plaintiff leased real estate, the Defendant would be supplied livestock products to the Plaintiff on credit from the Plaintiff while operating Mat on the said real estate (hereinafter “instant livestock products transaction agreement”).

(2) The Livestock Products Trade Agreement (Evidence No. 15) prepared at the time of the instant Livestock Products Trade Agreement is indicated as follows:

(1) The limit of credit transaction of livestock products shall be 50% of the total sum of performance guarantees and goods deposits for each store.

(2) The Defendant shall deposit the interest on the lease deposit in the Plaintiff’s designated account by the 10th day of the following month, based on the last day of each month, with the interest on the lease deposit (5% per annum, and 4.2% per annum, if the Plaintiff is leased only by static Croper) when operating the entire Mart in accordance with the real estate lease

(3) The Defendant shall provide the Plaintiff with a collateral (real estate, cash, insurance policy, etc.) equivalent to the credit transaction limit under Article 1.

In the case of real estate collateral, the amount of collateral security shall be set at a level higher than the credit transaction limit, and in case of cash, the principal shall be returned at the expiration of the contract

(6) (Article 6). 3 The Defendant supplied the Plaintiff with livestock products from April 28, 2014 to April 2, 2015, and paid all the sales price to June 21, 2016, while operating marinas on the instant real estate No. 2 in the following manner: