A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

around 12:05 on April 17, 2015, the Defendant driven Bbenz car at a section of about 2 km from the front of the Handong apartment in Busan Dong-gu to the front road without a driver's license on April 17, 2015.

"2015 Highest 4463"

1. On June 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven B Benz vehicles in the front of the Saemaeul depository located in the Busan metropolitan transportation Daegu-dong without a driver’s license on June 13, 2015, in the direction of about 2km in the direction of approximately 79 meters in front of the Saemaeul depository located in the Seo-gu Busan metropolitan transportation Daegu-dong.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;

The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, operated the instant benz vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license, and inquiry letter of driver's license;

1. Investigative into the ledger of driver's licenses and the main office;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 152 subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 46(2)2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The fact that a majority of the past sentence of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes (the aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes stipulated in the crime of violating the Act on the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicles with the largest punishment) committed a crime of the same kind at the end of the period of probation, despite being informed of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of the same kind at the same time without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of the same crime, and that the normal defendant who is favorable to the fact that he committed the crime of the same case recognized his mistake, is against the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, and circumstances leading to the crime of the