(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.06.09 2019고정208

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.06.09 2019고정208

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property;

A. On November 28, 2018, around 10:00, the Defendant alleged that part of the victim’s residence was erroneous in the Defendant’s land or survey before the victim’s residence in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and that he violated approximately three meters of the fluences on the fluences of the above residence, using the color frame, and infringed the Defendant’s utility by using the word “D or land fraud” on the ground that he did not use the word “D or land fraud.”

B. At around 13:00 on November 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) placed in the cremation of the victim’s residence; (b) placed the victim’s soil at the Defendant’s house on his/her own surface and her water flows out; (c) placed the victim’s water in a broad range of about 90cm and about 60cm in depth; and (d) placed the victim’s soil at the Defendant’s house, thereby harming its utility.

2. In the date, time, place, etc. described in paragraph (1)(b), the Defendant violated the victim’s residence by putting the wall out of the wall, using the wall, in order to cut up the soil in the flower owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement C in the second protocol of the trial;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel knew that the housing site was part of the site owned by the defendant from the time when the victim was removed, but did not return the land to the defendant. At the time when the defendant and the victim surveyed the site boundary, the land boundary was expressed more disadvantageously to the defendant, but the land boundary was indicated as the land boundary. The victim thought that the land survey engineer and the mother were combined with the survey engineer and the mother and expressed as above, and the victim expressed about about 3 meters of the land at the bottom of the dwelling space using the color frame as soon as possible, and the "D and the land fraud" was written in the form of "D and the land fraud". Thus, the defendant asserted that it is a legitimate act that does not go against the social rules.

However, whether the survey articles combine with the victim.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.14 2018고정2594

-서울북부지방법원 2020.10.29 2020고단2067

-인천지방법원 2020.01.10 2019고단6376

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.05.01 2018고단343

-수원지방법원성남지원 2020.12.17 2020고정549