1. Upon the primary claim, Defendant M = 155,100,000 won and its related amount from November 5, 2015 to December 12, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Under the underlying facts, the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1-20, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2-4, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, Eul evidence 1-16, Eul evidence 1-16, Eul evidence 1-2, and Eul evidence 2.

The relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendants and the rebuilding resolution 1 of this case are companies aimed at building design and supervision. When the Plaintiff refers to both the Defendants and the Defendants (Appointed Party) F, and the designated parties listed in the separate sheet of the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as “the Defendants”).

The Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government U (the total floor area of 1,306.10 square meters, hereinafter referred to as the “instant project site”).

(C) the 18th generation of the 6th generation of each of the 1,2, and 3th units above the ground (hereinafter “instant V lending”).

The owners of the divided property are divided owners (However, W is co-owned in Q and R each 1/2).

(2) From around 2014, the sectional owners of the instant VL, centering on Defendant C’s husband X, opened a general meeting on February 2015, under the attendance of 14 households among the 18 households, following the 18th generations: (a) reconstruction was conducted under the condition to increase the current 22 square meters of exclusive use (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”); and (b) the chairperson of the Z reconstruction promotion committee (hereinafter “Re-building promotion committee”) under the name of Defendant C, the husband of Defendant C, and the above X, the husband of the Defendant L, as the auditor; and (c) the Defendant AB and the above X director, the husband of the Defendant L, as the object of preferential negotiation; and (c) the corporation AC (hereinafter “AC”).

3) AD (AC representative director not in the registration of the AC) delegated by Y with the progress of the reconstruction project of this case, but seems to have been actually operated.

AE, AF and AG for each of the instant reconstruction projects from February 2015. The production of investment attempts necessary for the presentation of each of the instant reconstruction projects with AE, AF, and AG for each of the instant reconstruction projects (e.g., early 2015.