A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person who drives B wing-off cargo vehicles as their businesses;

On March 20, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 20, 2013, and driven it at a speed of about 70km from Seoul to the speed of panty bus stops in front of the panty bus stops, which are located in the organization of Kimpo-si at Kimpo-si.

At that time, since the victim C(58 years old) bus stops at the bus stops at the bus stops, there was a duty of care to stop the driver and to prevent the accident by properly manipulating the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.104%, was negligent in driving a vehicle while neglecting the front city while under the influence of alcohol content, and received the back portion of the bus left side of the said victim's driver's bus.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused injury to the victim C (the 58-year-old age), such as salt dump, tension, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the bus in a way that the amount equivalent to KRW 6,138,524 of repair cost by the exchange of parts.

2. On the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant driven a small-net village apartment complex located in the Mapo-Eup, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, with the background as described in the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, and driven a fwing-fran truck with the blood alcohol concentration of about 5km from approximately 0.104% under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.104% from the panty apartment complex to the front road in the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

3. No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on the road; and

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, driven the B wing freight truck, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police in relation to C.