Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On April 25, 2020, the Defendant: (a) at the “C cafeteria” located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon on Apr. 25, 2020; (b) at around 01:39, the Defendant found the Handphone in the influence of alcohol; and (c) did not receive a request from the above restaurant business proprietor’s son; and (d) took a bath to the said D; (b) on the ground that the victim E (ma, South, 50 years of age), who is the seat of the said D, said D, said D, “DD d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d e d d d e d d d d d e
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
On November 3, 2020, the victim appeared as a witness on the second day of November 3, 2020 and withdrawn his wish to punish the accused.
Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.