A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On December 9, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Gwangju District Court on April 10, 201, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Jeju District Court on April 10, 2013, and was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of attempted larceny, etc. on April 11, 2014, and on June 1, 2016, at the same court on June 1, 2016, sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

1. Violation of the punishment rate on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

A. On August 18, 2018, at around 12:21, the Defendant reported a slicker equivalent to KRW 5,000, the market price of the victim’s possession, which was kept inside the entrance of the first floor through the entrance, and stolen it.

B. On August 31, 2018, at around 13:10, the Defendant: (a) opened a string door door and entered a small room, thereby thefting the sum of KRW 150,000,000 (section 50,000,000) of the cash in the victim’s bank located in the Nowon-gu, Western-si; (b) and (c) committed a theft.

2. Intrusion upon residence;

A. At around 12:00 on August 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) invadedd the victim H’s residence located in Seopopopo City G beyond the stone fence into the house through the window; and (b) tried to enter the house via the window.

B. The defendant 1-B

(b) the date, time, place, 1-b.

The purpose of theft of the property, as described in the paragraph, was to open a gate and enter a small room, and intruded into the residence of the victim F.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence.

3. The defendant entering a building shall be subject to paragraph 1 (a).

the date, time, place, 1-A.

As described in paragraph C, the upcoming up to the second floor was invaded upon D managed by the victim C through the entrance that was not locked for the purpose of theft of the property.

Summary of Evidence

The facts of the judgment No. 1-A, and