A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2019, at the office of the Guri-gu B Team of the Guri-gu, 359 Guri-si, Guri-si on August 14:15, 2019, the Defendant found the police officers of the Defendant without delay on the ground that C while working in the above police station transferred the insult of the Defendant to the prosecution by prosecution.

The brine flab flab flab flab flab flaf flaf flaf flaf flaf flaf flaf flaf flaf flaf

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties concerning criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes related to video images;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] of the obstruction of the performance of official duties [Type 1]/ No person shall be subject to the obstruction of the performance of official duties [the scope of recommended and recommended punishment] (the scope of recommendation field and recommended punishment] basic area, six months to one year and six months [no person who is a general person] [the grounds for suspension of execution of punishment].

3. Determination of sentence: The defendant, six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence, on the ground that there was no particular defect in the performance of duties by a police officer, committed an assault against a police officer in the process of performing official duties, and furthermore, on the ground that there was a disciplinary action against a police officer in the national interrogation or dismissal, etc., and thus, the defendant is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on the ground that such an offense is determined to require a strict punishment for the sake of public authority and establishment of social law and order.

However, the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case, did not have any particular criminal record, was suffering from mental illness, and his family want to have the wife of the defendant.